Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 vs Arlo Video Doorbell: Which doorbell camera is right for you?

DMCA / Correction Notice
- Advertisement -

The best video doorbells make sure you never miss deliveries again (and that you can give cold callers the cold shoulder) so you can see and speak to anyone at your door from your smartphone, even when when you are not at home.

- Advertisement -

Arlo and Ring are the two biggest names in the video doorbell market right now, and each offers a flagship video doorbell that captures footage in an aspect ratio that ensures you can see the full length of someone at your door, And can see any package on their package. Legs – Ideal if you’re doing your holiday shopping online.

NS Arlo Video Doorbell will set you back $149.99 / £179.99 / AU$289.99, while Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 Slightly more expensive at $249.99 / £219 / AU$399.99. You may be wondering whether spending the extra $100 / £40 / AU$110 will make for a better experience when interacting with people on your doorstep, so we’ve rounded up the Arlo Video Doorbell Front Ring to help you choose the best video Video Doorbell Pro 2 is kept. Doorbell for your home.

Best Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 and Arlo Video Doorbell Deals


Read on to find out how these doorbell cameras compare — or, if you already know which smart doorbell you’re looking to buy, you can check out the current best prices for both products below. :


- Advertisement -

When it comes to price, the Arlo Video doorbell is more affordable than Ring’s top-of-the-range smart doorbell. As we mentioned, the Arlo model is priced at $149.99 / £179.99 / AU$289.99, while the Ring Video Doorbell Pro will set you back $249.99 / £219 / AU$399.99,

Both models are mains powered, although Arlo does offer a wireless version of its doorbell, priced at Rs. $199.99 / £179.99 / AU$329, In the US and Australia, the Arlo Essential is $50 / AU$40 more expensive than a wired doorbell, while both cost the same in the UK.

Ring doesn’t offer a battery-powered version of the Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2. If you want a wire-free option, you’ll need to invest in it. Ring Video Doorbell 4, which doesn’t offer the same video quality or aspect ratio as the Pro model, but is more affordable $199.99 / £179 / AU$329.

To get the most out of both doorbells, and to review camera-recorded footage at a later date, you’ll need to subscribe to the relevant online storage service. In the case of the Ring Video Doorbell, it’s the Ring Protect, which costs $3 / £2.50 / AU$4 per month. For Arlo devices, you’ll need an Arlo Secure subscription, which starts at $2.99 ​​/ £2.79 / AU$4.49 per month.


While both video doorbells are compact, with a smaller footprint, each has a different look. The Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 has a rectangular design, which combines a glossy black fascia with a slim silver surround, which is removable and can be swapped out for options in an array of colors including red, blue and gold. Is. The Arlo Video doorbell sports a rounded design with a stylish monochrome finish.

Both doorbells have a button that lights up when pressed and have a built-in camera, microphone, and speaker to enable you to see and speak to anyone at your door. The Ring Video Doorbell’s lens has a 150-degree field of view, and captures footage at a resolution of 1536 x 1536p, while the Arlo Video Doorbell has the same resolution but a wider 180-degree field of view.

As mentioned, both doorbells are mains-powered and need to be connected to existing doorbell wiring, although in the UK the Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 is available with an adapter that enables you to plug it into a power outlet . If you have an existing doorbell in your home, pressing both doorbells will activate it.

If you don’t already have a chime, Ring and Arlo both offer an additional plug-in chime that connects wirelessly to the doorbell. The Ring Chime will set you back $29.99 / £29.99 / AU$59, while the Arlo Chime costs $49.99 / £44.99 / AU$79.

Alternatively, both video doorbells can be connected to a smart speaker or smart display to sound alerts in your home. However, in the case of the Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2, this only applies to Amazon’s range of Echo smart speakers and Echo Show smart displays. Arlo’s bell, meanwhile, is compatible with devices from Amazon as well as those using Google Assistant, and has HomeKit support for those invested in Apple’s ecosystem.


When it comes to essential functionality, the Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 and Arlo Video Doorbell are evenly matched. Both will send alerts to your smartphone and activate the connected chime when the doorbell is pressed or motion is detected in the field of view.

Upon receiving this alert you can either log in and view the doorbell’s live feed from your smartphone or, provided you have subscribed to the relevant storage service, review the footage at a later date.

During testing, we were impressed with the quality of videos captured by both doorbells. The footage was clear, and the audio was in sync with the picture. The Ring’s doorbell has an advantage over Arlo’s here, as it captures colorful night-vision footage when it’s dark. While there’s no built-in LED (a feature that many of Ring and Arlo’s home security cameras offer), the doorbell has ambient light in the camera’s field of view to apply a fake color to the image and provide more detailed footage. Uses light. This comes in handy when you don’t have a porch light, or it’s not always on. However, the Arlo doorbell’s wider field of view means more of your driveway is captured in video.

Both video doorbells allow you to set up activity zones so that you’re only notified of motion in these areas, though this, along with many other features, requires a subscription. The Arlo doorbell is slightly better at differentiating between different types of motion, and can identify people, animals, vehicles, and packages, while Ring’s video doorbell can identify people, but not animals and vehicles; It has a package detection mode, but it’s more apt to set up than Arlo’s doorbell.

We also found that pressing the doorbell made it difficult to miss the notifications that Arlo’s video doorbell sends. Instead of just sending alerts, the doorbell makes Voice over IP (VoIP) calls to your smartphone. On testing, once this call was answered, loading the live feed from the doorbell’s camera was slightly faster than the feed from the Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2.

Ring also offers some features that aren’t found on the Arlo Video Doorbell. 3D Motion uses radar to identify the distance of a person, animal, vehicle or any other source of motion from your door, and only sends a notification when motion is within a certain range so that you are protected from unwanted alerts. Do not suffer The Bird’s Eye View feature provides an aerial map charting the path of any motion, which can be useful in finding out where the delivery person went with your package if you weren’t at home, for example. for.


When it comes to choosing the best video doorbell, both the Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 and the Arlo Video Doorbell perform their basic tasks equally well.

For those on a low budget, or who want a video doorbell that prioritizes alert speed and offers a wider field of view, the Arlo Video Doorbell is the better choice.

However, the Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 is better suited for those who want color night vision, or a device that’s packed with features to reduce unwanted alerts, and when the source leaves the doorbell’s field of view. If so, it tracks the speed.

  • Check out these great Amazon Echo deals and connect your video doorbell to a smart speaker

- Advertisement -

Stay on top - Get the daily news in your inbox

Recent Articles

Related Stories