Why the No Time To Die ending doesn’t really work

DMCA / Correction Notice
- Advertisement -


elder no time to die The perverts follow. Watch the movie before reading it.

- Advertisement -

James Bond is dead. Daniel Craig’s version of 007 is blown up by missile fire, preventing him from passing the virus to his partner and daughter – while Rami Malek’s Safin was left dead in a retractable pool of water , appropriate punishment for his long, meaningless monologues and a lack of clear motivation in the form of villains.

I didn’t like No Time to Die, although I was certainly grateful that I had the opportunity to watch a new Bond movie in a safe environment. It ranks third in the Daniel Craig canon for me, with a zippy and fun first hour, before it becomes weighty and degenerates into a somewhat boring third act.

advertisement

To me the fundamental problem at the heart of the Craig films — at least in their second half — is the Bond/Madeleine Swan relationship established in 2015’s Specter. I’ve struggled to invest in it, and No Time to Die asks you to buy it as the main emotional hook for the film. I don’t think it works.

- Advertisement -

It’s not like James Bond only works well when he’s single, regardless of how the series portrayed him historically. is that this relationship should be at least Interesting To watch. Daniel Craig and Lee Seydoux are both great actors individually, but they don’t have any chemistry together, and you just don’t get why this romance is exciting for either of them. There’s an oddly cool undercurrent between the pair, like these two guys have only gotten together because they’re both charming and went through some bad shit together.

Basically: Where’s the love?

I watched the beginning of No Time to Die, while Bond enjoyed retirement life with Madeleine and wondered, ‘Are these two people In fact have fun together?’ Casino Royale’s doomed Vesper Lind romance remains in the background of all these movies – and Craig’s chemistry with Eva Green was so memorable – that this new relationship just doesn’t measure up to it.

Ultimately, the film hinges on your investment in the pair. This is heightened by the presence of Bond’s daughter, whom the film strangely struggles to call outright. Is Despite several loud gestures, his daughter till the end.

A Bond ends where he makes a big sacrifice, working on paper. This is something the James Bond series hasn’t done before. The movie doesn’t justify it, though – we see Bond die at the end of a messy third act, before a typical villain’s pre-seeing island base (self-aware or derivative creative choice? Certainly the former. , but either or so) By the way, the flat result is the same).

An overstuffed cast of MI6 characters raises a toast for him. End.

Honestly, I wasn’t moved, and there have certainly been times over the years where I’m sure the Daniel Craig era is as Bond as I want it to be. I needed One may be invested in Bond’s demise, but the emotional core of this film is not true. Although I’m a little sad that Bond’s daughter’s soft toy, Doo Doo, was probably with British Navy missiles as it was.

It didn’t help that the film’s villainous duties were split by Rami Malek’s Safin — whose low appearance in the film was sold more by the trailers — and the concept of a virus.

I don’t think Bond lost to his worst enemy. Safin came too late in the film; Perhaps if he’d pulled the trigger on Felix Leiter earlier in the film, it would have meant more to the final performance for the pair (side note: the film didn’t need Billy Magnussen’s character, Safin’s an undercover flunky, of course. ).

  • how to watch james bond movies in sequence
  • best james bond gadgets
  • james bond actor rank

a flash of inspiration

My other big problem with No Time to Die is this – it gives you a taste of the movie that could have been in the first hour, and then it becomes something else entirely. I Liked It could have been a movie.

I’m talking about the Cuban sequence of the movie, in which Bond is going in secret with Ana de Armas’ character, Paloma. In this scene, Craig and D’Armas have more chemistry than the Bond actor with Lee Seydoux—and the setting is visually spectacular. It’s the pair breaking into a party from the CIA, then when things go wrong, a rival agent in Nomi (Lashana Lynch) gets into a massive firefight competing for the same goal.

It was the raw imagination of James Bond captured in a conceptually perfect sequence. He was fun. The movie will never be so entertaining again – and that’s a shame. Can’t we just have Bond, Paloma and Felix Leiter film on elaborate undercover missions for two hours?

Instead, No Time to Die spends much of its run crumbling under the weight of serial elements established in earlier films—not only Madeleine, but also the stuff of Blofeld, Spector, and Bond’s Gareth Mallory (Ralph Fiennes). With, none of which adds up to much in this film.

Theoretically, a Bond subseries with its own story arc Is Exciting, but the Craig movies have been wildly hit-and-miss in this regard. I wouldn’t mind returning to single-movie stories next James Bond instead, unless there’s a better plan for how the movies can be slotted together.

No Time to Die, then, was the unfinished end of the flawed Bond films. This is no reflection on the commitment and talent of Daniel Craig, who brought a very distinctive energy to the role and propelled the series to unprecedented levels of popularity – he deserved his victory lap. The film does not bring to mind the best elements of his films.

No Time to Die is now showing around the world.

  • best netflix movies

- Advertisement -

Stay on top - Get the daily news in your inbox

Recent Articles

Related Stories